RELATIONAL DIMENSIONS OF DOMINANCE–SUBMISSION IN ROMANTIC ENCOUNTERS (GENDER ASPECT)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4565.2021.46.13

Keywords:

dominance, submission, gender roles, romantic media discourse, initial romantic interaction, verbal immediacy cues, nonverbal immediacy cues

Abstract

Dominance-submission is one of the most fundamental dimensions of the interpersonal relationship of a romantic dyad. The comparative analysis demonstrates new insights into verbal and nonverbal behaviours, which signal interpersonal dominance-submission within romantic encounters in American dating culture, as well as which parts of the body are preferred to initiate face-to-face romantic interactions by heterosexual strangers. The sample of the study consisted of 40 representative codes, which included 133 verbal and 1996 nonverbal immediacy cues initiated by American women, as well as 116 verbal and 1087 nonverbal immediacy cues initiated by American men. The findings showed that the distribution of the roles during the initial romantic interactions follows the traditional gender stereotypes. Accordingly, men choose the “masculine” position of dominance, while women prefer the “feminine” position of submission. First, the verbal distinctiveness of dominance-submission is observed in the role deixis of the speaker and the addressee. The results suggest that within interactional control in the task performance cues, both self-nomination and identification of the addressee prevail in the feminine romantic media discourse; while, self-nomination is significantly preferred in the masculine romantic media discourse. Second, the nonverbal distinctiveness of dominance-submission is observed in the prevalence of nonverbal expression of the dominance in the masculine romantic media discourse; conversely, the preference for the nonverbal expression of submission is found in the feminine romantic discourse. Ultimately, gender equality is manifested in signalling dominance by the identical body parts, while the distinctiveness of the body parts is observed in expressing submission.

References

Морозова О.І. Stance: позиція суб’єкта дискурсивної діяльності. Вісник Київського національного лінгвістичного університету. Серія «Філологія». 2011. Т. 14. № 1. С. 87–93.

Романюк О.C. Концептуальні основи структуризації розвитку взаємовідносин романтичної діади. Вісник Житомирського державного університету імені Івана Франка. Серія «Філологічні науки». 2018. Вип. 1 (87). С. 128–132.

Ступак І.В. Особливості реалізації фреймової моделі анкет учасників дейтинг-шоу в німецькій та українській лінгвокультурах. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. 2017. № 26. C. 164–167.

Ущина В. Афективне позиціонування суб’єкта дискурсивної діяльності в англомовній комунікативній ситуації ризику. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2016. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 131–139. URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.60198 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Argyle M. Bodily communication. Madison : International Universities Press, 1988. 384 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203753835 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Burgoon J.K., Hale J.L. The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs. 1984. Vol. 51. P. 193–214. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390195 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Burgoon J.K., Johnson M.L., Koch P.T. The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communication Monographs. 1998. Vol. 65. P. 309–335. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376456 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Nonverbal Behaviors “Speak” Relational Messages of Dominance, Trust, and Composure / J.K. Burgoon, X. Wang, X. Chen, S.J. Pentland, N.E. Dunbar. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. P. 1–17. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624177 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Cameron J.J., Curry E. Gender roles and date context in hypothetical scripts for a woman and a man on a first date in the twenty-first century. Sex Roles. 2020. Vol. 82. P. 345–362. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01056-6 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Dunbar N.E., Burgoon J.K. Measuring nonverbal dominance. The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words / ed. by V. Manusov. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2005. P. 361–374.

Frith H., Kitzinger C. Reformulating sexual script theory. Theory Psychology. 2001. Vol. 11. №. 2. P. 209–232. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301112004 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Gifford R. Mapping non-verbal behavior on the interpersonal circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991. Vol. 61. P. 279–288.

Grammer K. Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 1990. Vol. 14, №. 4. P. 209–236. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989317 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Massey-Abernathy A.R., Haseltine E. Power Talk: Communication Styles, Vocalization Rates and Dominance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2019. Vol. 48. P. 107–116. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9592-5 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Richards L., Rollerson B., Phillips J. Perceptions of submissiveness: Implications for victimization. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied. 1991. Vol. 125. № 4. P. 407–411. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1991.10543302 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Rose S., Frieze I.H. Young singles scripts for a first date. Gender Society. 1989. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 258–268. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124389003002006 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

The Bachelor (Seasons 16-23) / The Bachelorette US (Seasons 8–15). 2012–2019. Episodes 01. URL: https://abc.com/shows/the-bachelor/season16…23/ (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Weeks J.W., Heimberg R.G., Heuer R. Exploring the role of behavioral submissiveness in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2011. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 217–249. URL: https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.3.217 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays / Z. Witkower, J.L. Tracy, J.T. Cheng, J. Henrich. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2020. Vol. 118. № 1. P. 89–120. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000181 (дата звернення: 08.12.2020).

Published

2021-11-29