FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL LINGUISTICS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL SOCIAL TRANSFORMATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4565.2024.60.4

Keywords:

politics, political linguistics, political communication, media effects theory.

Abstract

Summary. This study provides a theoretical overview of the key stages in the development of political linguistics, each characterized by the emergence of different approaches to political communication research, relevant for the time and historical context. It is established that the origins of political linguistics trace back to ancient rhetoric. Over time, with the advent of new communication tools, the focus of research shifted from studying the rhetorical skills of political speakers to examining political communication. Political communication is an interactive process that involves the transmission of information between politicians, the media, and the public. It occurs vertically from governmental institutions to citizens, horizontally among political actors, and upward from public opinion to authorities. World War I stimulated the study of political communication within the socio-political context, while World War II further emphasized the importance of such research. Taking into account the theoretical premises of social psychology, scholars studied the mechanisms of manipulation of public consciousness employed in propaganda and political agitation. During this period, the two-step flow model of communication by P. Lazarsfeld, content analysis methods, and the five-component communication model by H. Lasswell emerged. The analysis of lexical and punctuation language tools used in totalitarian discourse demonstrated how language can function as an instrument for distorting reality. Research on political communication was reinforced by theoretical assumptions made in the field of mass communication, specifically regarding the language of «effects» and «influences». During this period, agenda-setting theory, framing, and priming gained popularity, reflecting the idea that the media have the potential to influence audience attitudes. However, this effect significantly depends on pre-existing biases that shape the processing of media messages. The application of digital media technologies and the growing popularity of social networks marked a new stage in the development of political linguistics, which continues to this day.

References

Акайомова А. Політична комунікація як процес взаємодії політичних суб’єктів. Політичний менеджмент. 2011. № 1. С. 87–91.

Алексієвець О. Історія та сучасність політичної лінгвістики. Україна-Європа-Світ. Міжнародний збірник наукових праць. Серія : Історія, міжнародні відносини. 2012. Вип. 9. С. 248–255.

Левенець Ю. Політика. Політична енциклопедія / за ред.: Ю. Левенець, Ю. Шаповал та ін. Київ : Парламентське видавництво, 2011. С. 567–568.

Нагорна Л. Політична лінгвістика : стан і статус. Наукові записки Інституту політичних і етнонаціональних досліджень ім. І. Ф. Кураса НАН України. 2006. Вип. 30(2). С. 160–168.

Нагорна Л. П. Політична мова і мовна політика : діапазон можливостей політичної лінгвістики. Київ : Світогляд, 2005. 315 с.

Остапенко М. Політична комунікація : теоретичні аспекти дослідження. Політичний менеджмент. 2012. № 3. C. 135–144.

Шиманова-Стефанишин О. В. Політична комунікація в умовах воєнного стану в Україні : політологічний аналіз основних меседжів. Регіональні студії. 2022. Вип. 30. С. 30–36.

Allison L. Politics. The Oxford Concise Dictionary of Politics / comp. by I. McLean, A. McMillan. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2003. P. 422–423.

Blitefield J. Review of the Language of the Third Reich : LTI, Lingua Tertii Imperii: A Philologist’s Notebook, by V. Klemperer. Rhetoric and Public Affairs. 2018. Vol. 21. № 4. P. 744–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.21.4.0744.

Borah P. Media Effects Theory. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (1st ed.) / ed. by G. Mazzoleni. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2016. P. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc156.

Britannica. The Editors of Encyclopaedia. «Newspeak». Encyclopedia Britannica. December 1, 2023. URL:

https://www.britannica.com/art/newspeak (дата звернення 23.06.2024).

Gil de Zúñiga H., Chen H. T. Digital Media and Politics : Effects of the Great Information and Communication Divides. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2019. Vol. 63. № 3. P. 365–373. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1662019

Heywood A. What is politics? Politics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019. P. 8–10.

Lasswell Harold D. Language of politics / ed. by N. Leites. New York : G. W. Stewart, 1949. 358 p.

Lazarsfeld P. F., Berelson B., Gaudet H. The people’s choice. How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce, 1944. 178 p.

Lippmann W. Public Opinion (with a new introduction by Michael Curtis). New Jersey : Transaction Publishers, 1998. 427 p.

McQuail D. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London : SAGE Publications, 2010. 633 p.

Noelle-Neumann E. The Spiral of Silence. A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication. 1974. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 43–51. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.

Norris P. Political Communication. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences / ed. by N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes. Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2001. P. 11631–1640. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04364-3

Orwell G. Nineteen eighty-four. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1949). 2021. URL :

https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DDM110%20CAS/Orwell-1949%201984.pdf (date of access 23.06.2024).

Rogers M. Everett. Theoretical diversity in political communication. Handbook of Political communication Research / ed. by L. L. Kaid. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2004. P. 3–16.

Ryfe D. History and Political Communication : an Introduction. Political Communication. 2001. Vol. 18. № 4. P. 408–409. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600152647119

Scheufele D. A., Tewksbury D. Framing, agenda setting, and priming : The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication. 2007. Vol. 57. № 1 . P. 9–20. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

Schiappa E. The rhetoric of nukespeak. Communication Monographs. 1989. Vol. 56. № 3. P. 53–272. DOI :

https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390263.

Published

2025-03-12